close logo

Expounder of Vedas

рдЗрддрд┐рд╣рд╛рд╕ рдкреБрд░рд╛рдгрд╛рднреНрдпрд╛рдВ рд╡реЗрджрдВ рд╕рдореБрдкрдмреГрдВрд╣рдпреЗрддреНред
рдмрд┐рднреЗрддреНрдпрд▓реНрдкрд╢реНрд░реБрддрд╛рджреН рд╡реЗрджреЛ рдорд╛рдордпрдВ рдкреНрд░рд╣рд░рд┐рд╖реНрдпрддрд┐редред 1.267,268редред

The above verse in the Mahabharata is a declaration by its composer Krishna Dwaipayana(Vyaasa) regarding the purpose of the Epic itself. It means “Through Itihaasa-Puraana meaning of Veda is expounded. Vedas fear the ones not well versed in Itihaasa Puraana (рдЕрд▓реНрдк рд╢реНрд░реБрдд), for such persons attack Vedas by studying them. ”

One can easily infer what Vyaasa wants to convey here. At the outset of his epic, the author communicates the essentiality of Itihaasa-Purana for understanding Veda. The study of Veda done by a person who doesn’t know Itihaasa-Puraana has been equated to an attack on Vedas. It is thus fitting to say that Itihaasa and Puranas are supporters of Vedas.

But the question is – HOW?
A logical thought, backed by literary evidence is the answer to this тАШHowтАЩ.

For every Hindu, other than Buddhists, Jains and Charvaakas, Vedas are the highest and binding authority.
рдкрд░рд╛рддреНрддреБ рддрдЪреНрдЫреНрд░реБрддреЗрдГ (Vedanta Sutra- 2.3.41)

Shruti or Veda is Supreme.

Similarly, Manu Smriti says – рдзрд░реНрдо рдЬрд┐рдЬреНрдЮрд╛рд╕рдорд╛рдирд╛рдирд╛рдВ рдкреНрд░рдорд╛рдгрдВ рдкрд░рдВ рд╢реНрд░реБрддрд┐: редред (2.13) редред
тАШFor those curious about Dharma, Shruti is ‘Pramaana.’
The word ‘Pramaana’ (рдкреНрд░рдорд╛рдг) in Indic traditions/ languages means a reliable medium to ascertain authenticity. Let us understand it in the context of a human body. Eyes are called Pramaana for Vision. Ears are Pramaana for Sound. We can’t say that ears are Pramaana for Vision. We can’t ascertain the appearance of a subject, merely through sound. (E.g. Dasharath couldn’t ascertain through sound whether it was a deer or Shravankumar). Same way Nose is Pramaana for, smell. Taste buds for taste and skin for touch. Nose can’t ascertain taste. Ears can’t ascertain touch.

Every Pramaana has its subject, which is called ‘Prameya’ (рдкреНрд░рдореЗрдп). A prameya doesn’t have more than one Pramaana.

As already said, Veda is Supreme Pramaana.
ButтАж for WHAT?

Based on the above explanation of Pramaanas, Shruti can’t be Pramaana for vision, sound, touch, taste or smell. If we say that Shruti can be a Pramaana for them then there is no need of the other senses, which is not the case. And if we say Shruti and senses ascertain same things, then Shruti would be reduced to ‘mere expression of sensory experience in the form of words. ‘And this notion is not in harmony with the Supremacy of Shruti. Therefore Shruti has to be Pramaana for something which is not a subject of senses or any other tool of perception.

ThatтАЩs why Saayana Acharaya says:

тАЬрдкреНрд░рддреНрдпрдХреНрд╖реЗрдгрд╛рдиреБрдорд┐рддреНрдпрд╛рд╡рд╛ рдпрд╕реНрддреВрдкрд╛рдпреЛ рди рдмреБрдзреНрдпрддреЗред рдПрдирдВ рд╡рд┐рджрдВрддрд┐ рд╡реЗрджреЗрди рддрд╕реНрдорд╛рджреН рд╡реЗрджрд╕реНрдп рд╡реЗрджрддрд╛редредтАЭ

тАЬ Vedas are Vedas if they make us know that which is not known through other Pramanas.тАЭ

Now, look at Kenopnishad 1.3-
тАЬ рди рддрддреНрд░ рдЪрдХреНрд╖реБрд░реНрдЧрдЪреНрдЫрддрд┐ рди рд╡рд╛рдЧреНрдЧрдЪреНрдЫрддрд┐ рдиреЛ рдордирдГ ред
рди рд╡рд┐рджреНрдореЛ рди рд╡рд┐рдЬрд╛рдиреАрдореЛ рдпрдереИрддрджрдиреБрд╢рд┐рд╖реНрдпрд╛рддреН реетАЭ

тАЬThere sight travels not, nor speech, nor the mind. We know it not nor can distinguish how one should teach of тАШItтАЩ.тАЭ

This is a description of something which fits in the criteria of Shruti Pramaana.

Then see further the verses 5-8 to know what тАЩItтАЩ is.

тАЬрдпрджреНрд╡рд╛рдЪрд╛рд╜рдирднреНрдпреБрджрд┐рддрдВ рдпреЗрди рд╡рд╛рдЧрднреНрдпреБрджреНрдпрддреЗ ред
рддрджреЗрд╡ рдмреНрд░рд╣реНрдо рддреНрд╡рдВ рд╡рд┐рджреНрдзрд┐ рдиреЗрджрдВ рдпрджрд┐рджрдореБрдкрд╛рд╕рддреЗ рее 5рее
рдпрдиреНрдордирд╕рд╛ рди рдордиреБрддреЗ рдпреЗрдирд╛рд╣реБрд░реНрдордиреЛ рдорддрдореН ред
рддрджреЗрд╡ рдмреНрд░рд╣реНрдо рддреНрд╡рдВ рд╡рд┐рджреНрдзрд┐ рдиреЗрджрдВ рдпрджрд┐рджрдореБрдкрд╛рд╕рддреЗ рее 6рее
рдпрдЪреНрдЪрдХреНрд╖реБрд╖рд╛ рди рдкрд╢реНрдпрддрд┐ рдпреЗрди рдЪрдХреНрд╖реВрдБрд╖рд┐ рдкрд╢реНрдпрддрд┐ ред
рддрджреЗрд╡ рдмреНрд░рд╣реНрдо рддреНрд╡рдВ рд╡рд┐рджреНрдзрд┐ рдиреЗрджрдВ рдпрджрд┐рджрдореБрдкрд╛рд╕рддреЗ рее 7рее
рдпрдЪреНрдЫреНрд░реЛрддреНрд░реЗрдг рди рд╢реГрдгреЛрддрд┐ рдпреЗрди рд╢реНрд░реЛрддреНрд░рдорд┐рджрдВ рд╢реНрд░реБрддрдореН ред
рддрджреЗрд╡ рдмреНрд░рд╣реНрдо рддреНрд╡рдВ рд╡рд┐рджреНрдзрд┐ рдиреЗрджрдВ рдпрджрд┐рджрдореБрдкрд╛рд╕рддреЗ рее 8реетАЭ

тАЬ That which speech does not illumine,
but which illumines speech.

Know that alone to be the Brahm (the Supreme Being)(рдмреНрд░рд╣реНрдо)
not this which people worship here редред5редред
That which cannot be thought by mind,
but by which they say the mind is able to think.
Know that alone to be the Brahm
not this which people worship here редред 6редред
That which sees not with the eye,
but by which one sees the eye’s seeing.
Know that to be the Brahm and not this which men follow after here. редред7редред
That which cannot be heard by the ear,
but by which the ear is able to hear.
Know that alone to be Brahm
not this which people worship hereредред8редредтАЭ

So we learn that an entity which is beyond the sensory perception, and hence is a Pramaana for Shruti, is тАШBrahmтАЩ.

What is Brahm?
Shruti says:

рдПрд╖ рд╕рд░реНрд╡реЗрд╢реНрд╡рд░ рдПрд╖ рд╕рд░реНрд╡рдЬреНрдЮ рдПрд╖реЛрд╜рдиреНрддрд░реНрдпрд╛рдореНрдпреЗрд╖ рдпреЛрдирд┐рдГ рд╕рд░реНрд╡рд╕реНрдп рдкреНрд░рднрд╡рд╛рд╡реНрдпрдпреМ рд╣рд┐ рднреВрддрд╛рдирд╛рдореНредред Mandukya Upanishad редред- 6редред

тАЬIt is Sarva-Ishwara or Lord of all, it’s omniscient, it resides in all, it’s the womb of all creation, in it the origin, the sustenance and the dissolution of everything happens.

рдпрддреЛ рд╡рд╛ рдЗрдорд╛рдирд┐ рднреВрддрд╛рдирд┐ рдЬрд╛рдпрдВрддреЗ рдпреЗрди рдЬрд╛рддрд╛рдирд┐ рдЬреАрд╡рдиреНрддрд┐ред рдпрддреНрдкреНрд░рдпрдиреНрддрдпрднрд┐рд╕рдВрд╡рд┐рд╢рдВрддрд┐ред рддрджреНрд╡рд┐рдЬрд┐рдЬреНрдЮрд╛рд╕рд╕реНрд╡ред рддрджреН рдмреНрд░рд╣реНрдореЗрддрд┐ редред Taitreya Upanishad. 3.1редред

тАЬFrom whom all these creatures are born, due to which they live, and in which they ultimately repose, crave to know thatтАж
That is Brahm.тАЭ

These Shrutis define Brahm as the cause of all existence.
Vyaasa too defines it as рдЬрдиреНрдорд╛рджреНрдпрд╕реНрдп рдпрддрдГ редред 1.1.2 – Brahm Sutra редред Through whom creation, sustenance and dissolution happen. And this cause is said to be Conscious.

Chandogya Upanishad ред6.2.3ред – рддрджреИрдХреНрд╖рдд рдмрд╣реБ рд╕реНрдпрд╛рдВ рдкреНрд░рдЬрд╛ рдпреЗрдп – It ‘resolved’ to become many from one and to be born in many ways. Desire to be many is what makes Brahm conscious.

And this conscious entity is none other than the Self. That’s why word Aatma or self has been used for it.

See the verses of Aitareya Upanishad :

1. рдЕрдЧреНрд░реЗ рд╡реИ рдЗрджрдореН рдЖрддреНрдорд╛ рдПрдХрдГ рдПрд╡ рдЖрд╕реАрддреНред рдЕрдиреНрдпрддреН рдХрд┐рдЮреНрдЪрди рдорд┐рд╖рддреН рди рдЖрд╕реАрддреН ред рд╕рдГ рдИрдХреНрд╖рдд рд▓реЛрдХрд╛рдиреН рдиреБ рд╕реГрдЬреИ рдЗрддрд┐ редред1редред

In the beginning, the Aatma was One, and all this (universe) was the Aatma; there was nought else that saw. The Aatma thought, тАЬLo, I will make me worlds from out my being.тАЭ

2. рд╕рдГ рдЗрдорд╛рдиреН рд▓реЛрдХрд╛рдиреН рдЕрд╕реГрдЬрдд рдЕрдореНрднрдГ рдорд░реАрдЪреАрдГ рдорд░рдореН рдЖрдкрдГ рдЕрджрдГ рдЕрдореНрднрдГ рдкрд░реЗрдг рджрд┐рд╡рдореН рджреМрдГ рддрд╕реНрдп рдкреНрд░рддрд┐рд╖реНрдард╛ рдЕрдиреНрддрд░рд┐рдХреНрд╖рдВ рдорд░реАрдЪрдпрдГ рдкреГрдерд┐рд╡реА рдорд░рдГ рдпрд╛рдГ рдЕрдзрд╕реНрддрд╛рддреН рддрд╛рдГ рдЖрдкрдГ редред 2редред

These were the worlds it made; Ambhah – of the ethereal waters, Marichih – of light, Mara – of death and mortal things, Apah – of
the lower waters. Beyond the shining firmaments are the ethereal waters and the firmament is their base and resting-place; Space is the world of light; the earth is the world mortal, and below the earth in the lower waters.

3. рд╕рдГ рдИрдХреНрд╖рдд рдЗрдореЗ рдиреБ рд▓реЛрдХрд╛рдГ рд▓реЛрдХрдкрд╛рд▓рд╛рдиреН рдиреБ рд╕реГрдЬреИ рдЗрддрд┐ред рд╕рдГ рдЕрджреНрднреНрдпрдГ рдПрд╡ рдкреБрд░реБрд╖рдВ рд╕рдореБрджреНрдзреГрддреНрдп рдЕрдореВрд░реНрдЪреНрдЫрдпрддреН рее3редред

The Aatma thought, тАЬLo, these are the worlds; and now will I make me guardians for my worlds.тАЭ

Therefore he gathered the Purusha out of the waters and gave Him shape and substance.

These Shrutis declare the self as Brahm.

Another thing proved by them is that this Aatma or Brahm is not only the instrument cause but also the material cause. That’s why it is shown as resolving to become worlds and creatures. It’s the creator as well as the creation.

Now one may say that if Aatma itself is creation, then the world which is a subject of sensory perception becomes тАШPrameyaтАЩ for Vedas. But that is not justified. Because Vedas have declared the world to be ‘mere appearance.’

рдЗрджрдВ рдкреНрд░рдЮрдЪрдВ рдирд╛рд╕реНрддрдпреЗрд╡ рдиреЛрддреНрдкрдиреНрдирдВ рдиреЛ рд╕реНрдерд┐рддрдВ рдХреНрд╡рдЪрд┐рдд- (Tejobindupanishad 5.31)

– This creation is not real, it isn’t born, it doesn’t exist anywhere or at any time.

рдкреНрд░рддрд┐рднрд╛рд╕рдд рдПрд╡реЗрджрдВ рди рдЬрдЧрддреНрдкрд░рдорд╛рд░реНрдердГ- Mahopanishad. (5.108)

– The universe is mere appearance, it’s not the supreme goal.

Same way Yogshikhopanishad (4.18-19) (4.16-17) and 4.10 testify the same. The famous рдмреНрд░рд╣реНрдо рд╕рддреНрдпрдВ рдЬрдЧрддреН рдорд┐рдереНрдпрд╛, which is attributed to Shankaracharya, are in fact words of Niralamba Upanishad.

And finally, look at Chhandogya Upanishad’s –

рд╕рд░реНрд╡рдВ рдЦрд▓реНрд╡рд┐рджрдВ рдмреНрд░рд╣реНрдо – тАЬ All this (creation) is indeed Brahm.тАЭ

The world is merely an epiphenomenon of a reality called Brahm. The same thing has been said in the Mantra Part of Vedas. See this verse of Purusha Sukta –

рдкреБрд░реБрд╖рдВ рдПрд╡реЗрджрдВ рд╕рд░реНрд╡рдВ рдпрджреНрднреВрддрдВ рдпрдЪреНрдЪ рднрд╛рд╡реНрдпрдореНред рдЙрддрд╛рдореГрддрддреНрд╡рд╕реНрдпреЗрд╢рд╛рдиреЛ рдпрджрдиреНрдиреЗрдирд╛рддрд┐рд░реЛрд╣рддрд┐редред-

The present, the past and the future, everything is Purusha. Purusha is lord of Devtas and other creatures.

All this literary evidence says that as per Vedas, Brahm alone is non-dual, conscious, existence reality. And Vedas are Pramaana for this reality only. The subject of Vedas is this Brahm. And thatтАЩs why no one can explain Vedas without knowing Brahm. ThatтАЩs why Nirukta strictly says: рдЕрдерд╛рдкрд┐ рдкреНрд░рддреНрдпрдХреНрд╖рдХреГрддрд╛рдГ рд╕реНрддреЛрддрд╛рд░реЛ рднрд╡рдиреНрддрд┐редред7.1.2редред

And Itihaasa-Puraana is the supporters of Vedas, as their subject matter to is the same non-dual reality. In fact, they delve even deeper into this Brahm. We can say that the Itihaasa-Puraana is a magnification of Vedic aphorisms into voluminous epics. By reading Newton’s laws alone one can’t fathom motion. Same way Shruti Mantras alone will lead to nothing if the seeker has not imbibed the essence of Itihaasa-Puraanas. If you ignore Itihaasa-Puraana, your study of Veda is futile. The ineffable Brahm of Vedas becomes accessible even to the lowest of the low only through Itihaasa-Puraana. A study of Veda, not in harmony with Itihaasa-Puraana, is synonymous to undue labour. As already said, Brahm is not a subject of sensory perception. And the world doesn’t become an illusion by merely uttering Maya-Maya or Brahm-Brahm. There is no escape from miseries, sorrows and struggles of life even if you are told they are mere illusions. The body and the mind shall certainly respond to the world in the manner they are designed to respond, whether you are a Vaidika or anyone else. This state of mortals has been rightly realized by Itihaasa-Puraana. It is these Puranas that brought the Brahm, beyond space and time, into space and time, in the form of Teerthas, Vratas, Rivers, plants and animals. Whatever Dharma you witness today, in the form of temples, festivals, sublime poetry, diverse cuisines, it’s all due to Puraanas. Shruti didn’t prescribe them directly. Puranas make you realize the real through the unreal. It’s perfectly in harmony with the тАШ рд╕рд░реНрд╡рдВ рдЦрд▓реНрд╡рд┐рджрдВ рдмреНрд░рд╣реНрдо Or рдкреБрд░реБрд╖рдВ рдПрд╡реЗрджрдВ рд╕рд░реНрд╡рдВредтАЩ because there is no presence of the unreal and the real is present as it is. (рдирд╛рд╕рддреЛ рд╡рд┐рджреНрдпрддреЗ рднрд╛рд╡реЛ рдирд╛рднрд╛рд╡реЛ рд╡рд┐рджреНрдпрддреЗ рд╕рддрдГ ( 2.16 Gita). – This whole of the creation with forms and names is nothing but Brahm.

Vedas know it through negation and Puranas know it via inclusion. But the goal is same. It’s hard to negate with the mechanism of body we have but easy to include. Whatever is imagined or desired, whatever is seen, whatever is understood, let all that be Brahm. This the goal of Puranas.

.рдпрджреНрд░реВрдкрдВ рдордирд╕рд╛ рдЧреНрд░рд╛рд╣реНрдпрдВ рдпрджреН рдЧреНрд░рд╛рд╣реНрдпрдВ рдЪрдХреНрд╖реБрд░рд╛рджрд┐рднрд┐рдГ ред
рдмреБрджреНрдзрдпрд╛ рдЪ рдпрддреНрдкрд░рд┐рдЪреНрдЫреЗрджреНрдпрдВ рддрджреНрд░реВрдкрдордЦрд┐рд▓рдВ рддрд╡редред (Vishnu Purana 1.4.19)

That’s why the non-dual Brahm of Upanishads is Shri Krishna of Bhagvata Purana.

рд╡рджрдВрддрд┐ рддрддреНрд╡рд╡рд┐рджрд╕реНрддрддреНрд╡рдВ рдпрдЬреНрдЬреНрдЮрд╛рдирдорджреНрд╡рдпрдореНред
рдмреНрд░рд╣реНрдореЗрддрд┐ рдкрд░рдорд╛рддреНрдореЗрддрд┐ рднрдЧрд╡рд╛рдиреАрддреА рд╢рдмреНрджреНрдпрддреЗредред 1.2.11редред

Shuanaka asks Ugrashrava about Krishna and with the aforesaid shloka he described Krishna: тАЬKnowers of reality, speak of reality as knowledge without the duality of knower and the known. That reality is also called Brahm, Parmaatma or Bhagwaan.”

With this, he clearly defines the subject of Bhagvata.

This Krishna becomes Shiva in Shiva Purana . And the description of shiva is in it is the testimony for the same – Shiva Purana, Vayaviya Samhita, Purva khanda- 14-26 :

рдПрдХ рдПрд╡ рддрджрд╛ рд░реБрджреНрд░реЛ рди рджреНрд╡рд┐рддреАрдпреЛрд╜рд╕реНрддрд┐ рдХрд╢реНрдЪрдиред
рд╕рдВрд╕реГрдЬреНрдп рд╡рд┐рд╢реНрд╡рднреБрд╡рдирдВ рдЧреЛрдкреНрддрд╛рдиреНрддреЗ рд╕рдВрдЪреБрдХреЛрдЪ рдпрдГредред 14редред…….
рд╡реЗрджрд╛рд╣рдореЗрдирдордЬрд░рдВ рдкреБрд░рд╛рдгрдВ рд╕рд░реНрд╡рдЧрдВ рд╡рд┐рднреБрдореН ред
рдирд┐рд░реЛрдзрдВ рдЬрдиреНрдордиреЛ рдпрд╕реНрдп рд╡рджрдиреНрддрд┐ рдмреНрд░рд╣реНрдо рд╡рд╛рджрд┐рдирдГредред26редред

At the onset, Rudra alone and no one else exists. Rudra creates, Rudra sustains and Rudra destroys this arrangement. ред14ред
Whom knowers of Brahm know as unborn, I know that all-pervasive, immanent, eternal, primaeval being. ред26ред

Valmiki describes this reality as Raama in his Itihaasa Raamayana. Academia believes Raama of Valmiki is a mortal Prince. The parts of Baalkaanda and Uttar Kanda declaring him Naraayana are later additions. That’s why I will cite Sundarkaand declaring Raama тАШBrahmтАЩ :

рд╕рд░реНрд╡рд╛рдиреН рд▓реЛрдХрд╛рдиреН рд╕реБрд╕рдВрд╣реГрддреНрдп рд╕рднреВрддрд╛рди рд╕рдЪрд░рд╛рдЪрд░рд╛рдиреН ред
рдкреБрдирд░реЗрд╡ рддрдерд╛ рд╕реНрд░рд╖реНрдЯреБрдВ рд╢рдХреНрддреЛ рд░рд╛рдореЛ рдорд╣рд╛рдпрд╢рд╛рдГредред 5.51.39

Illustrious Rama can put an end to and dissolve all creatures including both movable and immovables of all worlds. He can recreate all of them in the same way. He has such superhuman powers.

From what we have read thus far, only Brahm has this potency.

This Brahm is revered as Divine feminine in Devi-Bhaagwat, Mahabhagwat & Markandeya Puranas. Itihaasa called Adbhut Ramayana too sings the glories of Goddess and herein Sita kills 1000 headed Raavana. This too is work of Vaalmiki. Similarly Ganesha Purana calls this reality as Ganapati and Bhavishya Purana extols Surya.

Itihaasa Mahaabhaarat is complete in itself, explaining the Aatma through Bhagavad Gita, Sanaata Sujaatiya and discourses of various Mahatmas in Vana Parva. It glorifies Krishna, Devi, Shiva, Skanda, Surya, Rama, Indra and the saga of Kaurava – Pandava Tussle.

Apart from all this Puranas themselves speak the features they have in common.

рд╕рд░реНрдЧрд╢реНрдЪ рдкреНрд░рддрд┐рд╕рд░реНрдЧрд╢реНрдЪ рд╡рдВрд╢реЛ рдордиреНрд╡рдВрддрд░рдгрд┐ рдЪред
рд╡рдВрд╢рд╛рдиреБрдЪрд░рд┐рддрдВ рдЪреИрд╡ рдкреБрд░рд╛рдгрдВ рдкрдЮрдЪрд▓рдХреНрд╖рдгрдореНредред Devi Bhagwat – (1.2.18)

Means the 5 subjects of a Purana are-
тАв Sarga (рд╕рд░реНрдЧ) – various universes coming into existence is called Sarga
тАв Pratisarga ( рдкреНрд░рддрд┐рд╕рд░реНрдЧ) – dissolution and then a recreation of the whole arrangement is Pratisarga
тАв Vamsha (рд╡рдВрд╢) – the saga of progenies of Gods, Seers and humans is called Vamsha
тАв Maanvantra – the tenure of a Manu is Maanvantra.

Apart from dealing with Brahm, Puranas deal with all these aspects. However, 2.10.1-2 of Bhagvata Purana and Krishna Janma Khand (233.8-10) of Brahmavaivarta Purana set out 10 subjects of a Purana, which are nothing but an elaboration aforesaid features. These 10 features have been explicitly mentioned there, which otherwise are already included in 5 former subjects.

Puranas are the preserver of Polytheism. Ganesha, Shiva, Devi, Vishnu and Surya, all of them have been glorified as Brahm in the Puraanas. Puraanas themselves explain why they have sung the glories of Brahm in different forms. The Maanvantra aspect of Puraanas is the key to this diversity. Without getting into much of the calculations, letтАЩs simply understand it in brief.

As per Puranas; –

– The creation, that is one universe exists during one half of the day of Brahma(4 headed God, not Brahm) of that universe.
– The creation gets dissolved in its source in the other half that is a night of Brahma.
– One half of the day of Brahma is 1 Kalpa.
– Every Kalpa sees the rule of 14 Manus. Manus are progenitors of human civilization.
– There are 4 Yugas – Sat Yuga, Treta Yuga, Dwaapar Yuga and Kali Yuga.
– Each of these Yugas have their own time limit(which shall not be discussed now).
– When these 4 Yugas complete their cycle for 71 times, tenure of a Manu ends.
– When 14 Manus complete their tenure, 1 day of Brahma ends or 1 Kalpa ends.
– Thus these creation and dissolution keep happening in a cyclical manner.

Different Puranas are sagas of different Kalpas. In the same manner, many other universes are created during the day of Brahmas of such universes. The concept of multiverse or multi-universe does exist in Itihaasa Puranas. Prominent proofs of the same are in the Bhagvata, Brahmavaivarta Purana and Yoga Vashistha. Just as every universe has its own Brahma, it also has its own Vishnu, Rudra, Devi and Ganapati. But there is one lord of all universes with whose will all these Gods perform their functions. That is Brahm. One of these 5 main gods is established in union with Brahm (рддрд╛рджрд╛рддреНрдореНрдп with Brahm), in a particular Kalpa. рдпрдГ рд╣ рд╡реИ рддрддреН рдкрд░рдордВ рдмреНрд░рд╣реНрдо рд╡реЗрдж рд╕рдГ рдмреНрд░рд╣реНрдо рдПрд╡ рднрд╡рддрд┐ – He, verily who knows that Supreme Brahm, becomes himself Brahm. (Mundak Upanishad – 9.) Hence that very God will be presiding over other gods in that Kalpa. ThatтАЩs why Vishnu Purana talks of Kalpa where Vishnu Presides. Shiva Purana talks of RudraтАЩs supremacy and so on. These gods too are not free from mortality. Their respective ages have been given the Linga MahaPurana. But Brahm is the lord of all the universes hence, what 5 Gods are to their respective universes, Brahm is to the entire arrangement. That Brahm is рд╕рд░реНрд╡( (everything) It is Vishnu, itтАЩs Shiva, its Brahma, itтАЩs Ganesha, itтАЩs Devi. ItтАЩs everything, from a speck to this multitude of universes.

ThatтАЩs why the ancient seers of India sang to this Brahm in diverse forms. The aim is to establish a union with that Brahm. Vyaasa for easy comprehension, described that Brahm in various Puranas, so that each one of us can choose a form which suits our persona. Its the expansion of these Shrutis –

рдЕрдВрддрд░рдЬрд╛рдпрдорд╛рдиреЛ рдмрд╣реБрдзрд╛ рд╡рд┐рдЬрд╛рдпрддреЗ – Yajurveda- 31.29
– The unborn is born in many ways.
рд╕рдЧреБрдгрдирд┐рд░реНрдЧреБрдгрд╕реНрд╡рд░реВрдкрдВ рдмреНрд░рд╣рдВ – Tripadvibhutimahanarayan upanishad – 1.1
– Brahm is with forms as well as formless
рднрд╛рд╡рдЧреНрд░рд╛рд╣реНрдпрдореН рдЕрдиреАрдбрд╛рдЦреНрдпрдВ – Shevtashvatar Upanishad- 5.14
– The master of all becomings and not becomings.

This concept has been clearly explained in Rudra Samhita, Adhyaaya- 9 of Shiva Purana. Wherein Brahm reveals himself in the form of Uma and Maheshvara to Vishnu and Brahma of a universe. The Maheshwara has been thus described- тАШHe had 5 faces and three eyes in every face. A crescent moon adorned his head. He had matted locks and was fair in complexionтАжтАЩ

In further verses, Saguna Brahm Maheshvara says to Brahma – тАЬO’ Brahma, such a sublime form of mine shall come into this universe through you. It will be called тАШRudra.тАЩ Rudra would have the same potency as me.тАЩ RudraтАЩ and I are one.тАЭ

Many people have opinions that such a concept is peculiar to Puranas and is not in harmony with the Vedas. But thatтАЩs far from the truth. The aforesaid part of Shiva Purana is an explanation of following Shrutis from Veda.

рдПрдХреЛ рд╣рд┐ рд░реБрджреНрд░реЛ рди рджреНрд╡рд┐рддреАрдпрд╛рдп рддрд╕реНрдереБ:ред Shvetashvatar Upanishad 3.2редред
рдПрдХ рдПрд╡ рд░реБрджреНрд░реЛ рди рджреНрд╡рд┐рддреАрдпрд╛рдп рддрд╕реНрдереБ:ред Taitreya Samhita- 1.8.6.1редред
рд░реБрджреНрд░рдореЗрдХрддреНрд╡рдорд╛рд╣реБрдГ рд╢рд╛рд╢реНрд╡рддрдВ рд╡реИ рдкреБрд░рд╛рдгрдВред AtharvaShiras-5редред

All these Shrutis say there is only 1 Rudra. It is Primeval and eternal. This one Rudra is further described as –

рдпреЛ рджреЗрд╡рд╛рдирд╛рдореН рдкреНрд░рднрд╡рд╢реНрдЪреЛрджреНрднреНрд╡рд╢реНрдЪ рд╡рд┐рд╢реНрд╡рд╛рдзрд┐рдкреЛ рд░реБрджреНрд░реЛ рдорд╣рд░реНрд╖рд┐:ред рд╣рд┐рд░рдгреНрдпрдЧрд░реНрдн рдЬрдирдпрд╛рдорд╛рд╕ рдкреВрд░реНрд╡реЗ рд╕ рдиреЛ рдмреБрджреНрдзрдпрд╛ рд╢реБрднрдпрд╛ рд╕рдВрдпреБрдирдХреНрддреБредред Shevtashvatar- 3.4редред
рджреЗрд╡рд╛рдирд╛рдореН рдкреНрд░рднрд╡рд╢реНрдЪ – God of all Gods
рдЙрджреНрднрд╡рд╢реНрдЪ – Source of all Gods
рд╣рд┐рд░рдгреНрдпрдЧрд░реНрдн рдЬрдирдпрд╛рдорд╛рд╕ – Cause of Brahma or Hiranyagarbhaa.

This one Rudra is no other than Brahm or Maheshvara of Shiva Purana.

This Brahm Rudra has also been extolled in
Rig Veda: 2.33.1 – No one can take away the strength of Great lord of the Universe, Rudra. His strength is not separate from him.
Rig Samhita Mandala.8. Sukta.72 says: рдЕрдВрддрд░рд┐рдЪреНрдЫрдВрддрд┐ рддрдВ рдЬрдиреЗ рд░реБрджреНрд░рдВ рдкрд░реЛ рдордиреАрд╖рдпрд╛ – people seeking freedom seek Supreme Rudra within themselves.
Atharva- 7.12.1 too glorifies the Rudra as supreme.
All these Shrutis describe one Rudra who is Brahm.

Now, look at these Shrutis –
рдЕрд╕рдВрдЦреНрдпрддрд╛ рд╕рд╣рд╕реНрддреНрд░рд╛рдгрд┐ рдпреЗ рд░реБрджреНрд░рд╛ рдЕрдзрд┐рднреВрдореНрдпрд╛рдоредред Yajurveda- 16.54редред
тАШMany a thousand Rudras are there on the land.тАЩ – This Vedic verse talks of thousands of Rudras. It is fitting that these Rudras are Rudras of different universes as mentioned in the Puranas.
Rig samhita- 10.64.8 – рд░реБрджреНрд░рдВ рд░реБрджреНрд░реЗрд╖реБ рд░реБрджреНрд░рд┐рдпрдВ рд╣рд╡рд╛рдорд╣реЗредред
Rig Samhita – 7.35.6 – рд╢рдВ рдиреЛ рд░реБрджреНрд░реЛ рд░реБрджреНрд░реЗрднрд┐рд░реНрдЬрд▓рд╛рд╖рдГредред
Rigveda Samhita- 7.10.4 – рд░реБрджреНрд░рдВ рд░реБрджреНрд░реЗрднрд┐рд░рд╛ рд╡рд╣рд╛ рдмреГрд╣рдиреНрддрдореНредред

All these verses say that there is One Rudra along with many Rudras. Shiva Purana too establishes the same concept in Rudra Samhita.
Hence the aforesaid concept of Puranas is clearly an рдЙрдкрдмреГрд╣рдг (explanation) of Vedic Shrutis. If one doubts that 1 Rudra in Vedas is not Brahm, then see the Bhashya of Saayana- 1- рд░реБрджреНрд░рд╕реНрдп рдкрд░рдореЗрд╢реНрд╡рд░рд╕реНрдп ( рдЛ рдХ 6.28.7)

2- рд░реБрджреНрд░рдГ рд╕рдВрд╣рд░реНрддрд╛ рджреЗрд╡рдГ ( рдЕрдерд░реНрд╡- 1.19.3)
3- рдЬрдЧрддреНрд╕реНрд░рд╖реНрдЯрд╛ рд╕рд░реНрд╡рдВ рдЬрдЧрджрдиреБрдкреНрд░рд╡рд┐рд╖реНрдЯрдГ рд░реБрджреНрд░рдГ (рдЕрдерд░реНрд╡.7.12.1)
4- рд░реБрджреНрд░рдГ рдкрд░рдореЗрд╢реНрд╡рд░: ( рдЕрдерд░реНрд╡.11.2.3)

Thus Saayana too declared тАШOne RudraтАЩ as Brahm. This evidence establishes two things –

1. Concept of Multiverse, kalpas in Puranas is an explanation of Veda.
2. Vedic Rudra = Puranic Rudra.

Many sects and academicians also believe that that stories of Avataaras of Vishnu are Puraanic fables, or are hyper-imagination of Puranic age. They too should know that the concept of Avataaras is an inherent part of the Vedas.

Rig Samhita: 1.22.18 says: рд╡рд┐рд╖реНрдгреБрд░реНрдЧреЛрдкрд╛ рдЕрджрд╛рднреНрдпрдГ рдЕрддреЛ рдзрд░реНрдорд╛рдгрд┐ рдзрд╛рд░рдпрддреНредVishnu is the invincible protector of the earth/cows. He upholds Dharma.
Rig Samhita: 1.22.20 says: рд╕рджрд╛ рдкрд╢реНрдпрдВрддрд┐ рд╕реВрд░рдпрдГ- the wise always have a vision of Him.

Rig Samhita- 1.22.11 says: рддрджреН рд╡рд┐рдкреНрд░рд╛рд╕реЛ рд╡рд┐рдкрдиреНрдпрд╡реЛ рдЬрд╛рдЧреГрд╡рд╛рдВрд╕рдГ рд╕рдорд┐рдиреНрдзрддреЗред рд╡рд┐рд╖реНрдгреЛрд░реНрдпрддреН рдкрд░рдордВ рдкрджрдореНредтАУ Aware, detached wise individuals know the Supreme Abode of Vishnu, which itself is a manifestation of Vishnu.

рдпрдГ рдкрд╛рд░реНрдерд┐рд╡рд╛рдирд┐ рд╡рд┐рдордореЗ рд░рдЬрд╛рдВрд╕рд┐ред рдпреЛ рдЕрд╕реНрдХрдореНрднрд╛рдпрджреБрддреНрддрд░рдВ рд╕рдзрд╕реНрдердореНредред (Rig- 1.154.1)
рдп рдЙ рддреНрд░рд┐рдШрд╛рддреБ рдкреГрдерд┐рд╡реАрдореБрдд рджреНрдпрд╛рдореЗрдХреЛ рджрд╛рдзрд╛рд░ рднреБрд╡рдирд╛рдирд┐ рд╡рд┐рд╢реНрд╡рд╛ред ( Rig- 1.154.4)
In these verse Vishnu has been mentioned as creator of Agni, Vaayu and Aditya.

It is fitting that Veda sees Vishnu as a supreme being and protector of Dharma. The same image of Vishnu is glorified in Puranas, but in an even organized and detailed manner. Veda also says that Vishnu is praised for his valour.

ThatтАЩs why Shukla Yajur Veda 4.20 and Rig, 1.154.2 say :
рдкреНрд░ рддрджреН рд╡рд┐рд╖реНрдгреБрдГ рд╕реНрддрд╡рддреЗ рд╡реАрд░реНрдпреЗрдг рдореГрдЧреЛ рди рднреАрдордГ рдХреБрдЪрд░реЛ рдЧрд┐рд░рд┐рд╖реНрдард╛ред

– Just as a beast (рдХреБрдЪрд░) is praised in the jungle for his strength same way Vishnu is praised for his рд╡реАрд░реНрдп or strength or valour.

This verse clearly indicates, just as a lion or a tiger hunts down other animals, same way Vishnu hunts down Asuras. Vishnu has clearly been declared Supreme being by the Veda.

As far as Avataaras are concerned, Veda says:
рдкреНрд░рдЬрд╛рдкрддрд┐рд╢реНрдЪрд░рддрд┐ рдЧрд░реНрднреЗ рдЕрдВрддрд░рдЬрд╛рдпрдорд╛рдиреЛ рдмрд╣реБрдзрд╛ рд╡рд┐рдЬрд╛рдпрддреЗ – Yajurveda – 31.29
– Supreme being, lord of creatures, without getting into the womb is born in many ways.

This is the Vedic root of Avataaras. No one can deny the fact that Saguna Brahm or Avataaras of Brahm and their legends are peculiar to Puranas. They are present in one of the most ancient literature of the world too.

тАв Matsya Avataar – supreme bring descending as a Fish. This AvataaraтАЩs story comes in the Shathpath Brahman- 1.8.1.1. The same story comes in Bhagvata Purana – (Skanda-8 Adhyaaya-24) There is no difference in the characters and the story. Matsya Purana- 1, Chapter. 256, Agni Purana Adhyaaya 2.46, Garuda Purana 1.142, Padma Purana5.4.73, Mahaabhaarat 12.340 too deal with the same story of Matsya.

тАв Kurma Avataara – Naaraayana in the form of a gigantic turtle. The story of Kurma comes in Taitreya Aranyaka – 1.23.3. In this story, Prajapati or Brahma saw a huge turtle( Kurma) roving in an ocean. Kurma tells him that it had been there long before the Prajapati came into being. Word Purusha has been used for Kurma. His 1000 heads, 1000 eyes, 1000 feet have been mentioned. It is fitting that this turtle is the Parmaatman of the Purush Sukta himself. In Shathpath Brahman 7.5.1.5 too, this Kurma has been glorified. The story of supreme being descending as Kurma as an explanation of Vedas comes in Bhagvata Purana, 8th Skanda, 7th chapter. The same story comes in the Kurma Purana, the Mahabharata etc.

тАв Varaha Avataar: Incarnation of Bhagwan in the form of a boar. Taitreya Brahman, Taitreya Samhita and Shathpath Brahman, tell the story of Varaha Avataar thrice. Here the meaning of those mentions shall be given:

Taitreya Samhita- 7.1.5.1 – There was only water and water. Prajapati robed there in form of Vaayu. There he saw a submerged land. Thus he assumed the form of a boar took out the land surface. The same story comes in the Bhagvata Purana, Skanda – 3, Chapter-13 – From Prajapati’s nose a boar emerged who freed the land surface from waters. Taitreya Brahman 1.1.6 – Prajapati assumed the form of a boar and freed the land submerged in the waters. Shathpath Brahman – 14.2.11, Atharva Veda – 12.1.48 too mention the same saga of Varaha Avataar. The same story appears in Vaayu Purana – 6.16-23, Bramhaand Purana – 1.5.16-23, Matsya Purana- 248.66-74, Vishnu Purana- 1.4.32.36, Agni Purana – 5.1-3.

тАв Narsimha Avataara – the Narsimha Gayatri in Taitreya Aranyaka gives complete information about Narsimha Avataara: рд╡рдЬреНрд░рдирдЦрд╛рдп рд╡рд┐рджреНрдорд╣реЗ рддреАрдХреНрд╖реНрдгрджрдВрд╖реНрдЯреНрд░рд╛рдп рдзреАрдорд╣рд┐ рддрдиреНрдиреЛ рдирд╛рд░рд╕рд┐рдВрд╣рдГ рдкреНрд░рдЪреЛрджрдпрд╛рддреН ред ItтАЩs expansion comes in the Bhagvata Puraana, Skanda -7, Chapter -8 Verse- 20-21.

тАв Vaamana Avataara – We don’t need to search much for Vaamana Avataara of Vishnu in Vedas. Even the West admits that Vedas are full of praise of Vishnu in the form of Vaamana. Rig Samhita, Mandala 1, 254th Sukta gives complete detail of Vaamana. Rig Samhita: 1.22.17 to mentions the act of measuring 3 worlds by Vaamana. Shathpaath Brahman 1.2.5-7 too has a story of Vaamana Avataar, which is the root of Puraanic story of Vaamana. This story deals with Dev-Asura tussle and Dwarf Vishnu helps Devas in winning their share back.

тАв Parashuraama – There should be no doubt in regards to Parashuraama as the seer of Mantra 10.110 of Rig Samhita is, Jamdagni’s son Rama. In Puraanas and Itihaasa this Rama who is the son of Jamdagni is known as Parashuraama. Parashu means axe. This axe-wielding Rama is known for destroying Kshatriyas 21 times. Mention of the same appears in Mahaabhaarat – ii.49; iii.98, 116-117; Matsya Purana chapter-47, Vishnu Purana 4.7 & 4.11, Bhagvata 1.3.20, 2.7.22 & 6.15-16.

тАв Rama- The source of the legend of Rama is Rig Samhita. Rama is popularly known as RamaBhadra. The way the word тАШBhaamaтАЩ is used for SatyaBhaama ( KrishnaтАЩs wife), the same way the word Bhadra denotes Rama. It’s not a whimsical thing but a rule of grammar, which says that either the Purva Pada (рдкреВрд░реНрд╡ рдкрдж) i.e. Rama and Uttar Pada (рдЙрддреНрддрд░ рдкрдж) i.e. word Bhadra, cab be omitted. тАЬрд╡рд┐рдирд╛рд╜рдкрд┐ рдкреНрд░рддреНрдпрдпрдВ рдкреВрд░реНрд╡реЛрддреНрддрд░рдкрджрдпреЛрд░реНрд▓реЛрдкрдГредтАЭ – ( Vaartika- 5.3.63)

Now, look at this mantra of Rig Samhita 10.3.3 –
рднрджреНрд░реЛ рднрджреНрд░рдпрд╛ рд╕рдЪрдорд╛рдирдГ рдЖрдЧрд╛рддреН рд╕реНрд╡рд╕рд╛рд░рдВ рдЬрд╛рд░реЛ рдЕрднреНрдпреЗрддрд┐ред
рдкрд╛рд╢реНрдЪрд╛рддреН рд╕реБрдкреНрддрдХреЗрддреИрд░реНрджреНрдпреБрднрд┐рд░реНрд╡рд┐ рддрд┐рд╖реНрдардиреН рд░реБрд╢рджреНрднрд┐рд░реНрд╡рдиреИрд░рд┐рдорд┐ рд░рд╛рдордорд╕реНрдерд╛рддреНредред
тАЬ Along with рднрджреНрд░рд╛( Sita) рднрджреНрд░( Rama) came to a forest. And n the absence of Rama, рдЬрд╛рд░( Raavana) took away рд╕реНрд╡рд╕реГ( Sister like) Sita.

After the killing of Raavana, рджреНрдпреБрднрд┐рд░реНрджрд╛рд░реИрдГ (Sita ) along with her radiance came before Rama.тАЭ
Here Ravana is declared dead on the following basis: рдорд╛рддреГрд╡рддреН рд╕реНрд╡рд╕реГрд╡рдЪреНрдЪреИрд╡ рддрдерд╛ рджреБрд╣рд┐рддреГрд╡рдЪреНрдЪ рдпреЗред рдкрд░рджрд╛рд░реЗрд╖реБ рд╡рд░реНрддрдВрддреЗ рдирд░рд╛рдГ рд╕реНрд╡рд░реНрдЧрдЧрд╛рдорд┐рдирдГредред

Atharva Samhita too talks of Raavana as рдмреНрд░рд╛рд╣реНрдордгреЛ рдЬрдЬреНрдЮреЗ рджрд╢рд╢реАрд░реНрд╖реЛ рджрд╢рд╛рд╕реНрдпрдГ (4.6.1) Here a 10 headed Brahmin has been talked of.

Vaalmiki too in his Itihaasa called Ramayana explained this part of the Vedas.

тАв Krishna: In Vedas, Vishnu has been referred to as рд╡рд┐рд╖реНрдгреБрд░реНрдЧреЛрдкрд╛ рдЕрджрд╛рднреНрдпрдГ – Rig Samhita- 1.22;28
It means Vishnu is an invincible Cowherd.

Appendix of Rig Samhita: 7.55.4 mentions – Naarayana upon serpent named Kaaliya, of Yamuna River –

рдХрд╛рд▓рд┐рдпреЛ рдирд╛рдо рд╕рд░реНрдкреЛ рдирд╡рдирд╛рдЧрд╕рд╣рд╕реНрддреНрд░рдмрд▓рдГред
рдпрдореБрдирд╛рд╣реГрджреЗ рд╕ рдЬрд╛рддреЛ рдирд╛рд░рд╛рдпрдг рд╡рд╛рд╣рдирдГредред

Chandogya Upanishad 3.17.6 – Ghora AngirasaтАЩs disciple talks of Krishna, who is the son of Devaki.

Taitreya AranyakaтАЩs 10.1.6 – also declares Vishnu as Vaasudev.
рдирд╛рд░рд╛рдпрдгрд╛рдп рд╡рд┐рджреНрдорд╣реЗред рд╡рд╛рд╕реБрджреЗрд╡рд╛рдп рдзреАрдорд╣рд┐ред рддрдиреНрдиреЛ рд╡рд┐рд╖реНрдгреБ рдкреНрд░рдЪреЛрджрдпрд╛рддреНредред

All this literary evidence says that Krishna Avataar is a part of Vedas.

The claims like Rudra and Vishnu were not worshipped in Vedic age are hence destroyed. Puranas are as essential as Vedas. ThatтАЩs Bhagwan Vishnu is said to be рдкреБрд░рд╛рдг рд╡рд┐рдЧреНрд░рд╣ – Who has a body of Puranas – ( Padma Puraana – Swarga khanda – 62.2-7) . Without Puraana, no one can fathom Veda. And via the knowledge of Vedas only four-headed Brahma became a creator. He too couldn’t know Veda without knowing Purana. ThatтАЩs why Matsya Purana .53.3 says: рдкреБрд░рд╛рдгрдВ рд╕рд░реНрд╡ рд╢рд╛рд╕реНрддреНрд░рд╛рдгрд╛рдореН рдкреНрд░рдердордВ рдмреНрд░рдореНрд╣рдгрд╛ рд╕рдореГрддрдВред рдЕрдирдиреНрддрд░рдВ рдЪ рд╡рдХреНрддреНрд░реЗрднреНрдпреЛ рд╡реЗрджрд╛рд╕реНрддрд╕реНрдп рд╡рд┐рдирд┐рд░реНрдЧрддрд╛рдГредред Before all Shastras, Brahma recalled Puranas from previous Kalpa, thereafter Vedas emanated from his mouth.

This analysis makes us conclude one thing for sure. Puranas are supporters and decoders of Vedas. Sages like Vyaasa and Vaalmiki, by giving us Itihaasa and Puraana, have made the intricate subjects of Vedas available to every individual of the world.

Therefore I enjoin upon the Hindus, to take pride in their Profound Puranas. Don’t fall prey to the trap of Vidharmis.

Therefore тАУ рд╕рджрд╛ рд╕реЗрд╡реНрдпрд╛ рд╕рджрд╛ рдзреНрдпреЗрдпрд╛ рдХрдерд╛ рдкреМрд░рд╛рдгрд┐рдХреА рд╢реБрднрд╛редред

Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in this article belong to the author. Indic Today is neither responsible nor liable for the accuracy, completeness, suitability, or validity of any information in the article.

Leave a Reply